Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2011 12:40:44 GMT -5
In HSFB and NCAA, if you block the extra point kick, you can run it back for 2 points and I would like to see that rule adapted in the NFL.
What do you think?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2011 14:16:52 GMT -5
NO, I THINK IT IS A TERRIBLE RULE THE DEFENSIVE TEAM SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO SCORE ON THE OTHER TEAMS PAT. COLLEGE SHOULD GET RID OF THIE RULE.
|
|
|
|
Post by JugglingReferee on Oct 9, 2011 14:21:38 GMT -5
About 4-5 years ago, the CFL had an incredible finish to a game.
The lead was going back and forth and with just a small amount of time remaining, one team scored a major for a 1 point lead. They went for 2 to force the other team to only tie with a FG. However, on the PAT, B intercepted the ball and took it to the house for the "Pick-2". B went back into the lead by 1. A was forced to execute a short KO, which I believe B ultimately possessed.
It was a great ending to a great game!
|
|
|
|
Post by checknadvise on Oct 10, 2011 3:40:05 GMT -5
Umm...in NFHS, you can't run it back. Once the kick attempt is apparently unsuccessful, the play is over.
|
|
|
|
Post by melkaman8200 on Oct 10, 2011 18:59:46 GMT -5
I think in NCAA, it's a one-point safety. I remember seeing it happen in college game a few years ago.
It would make it interesting if the NFL adopted a one-point safety for running back a failed PAT attempt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2011 23:06:21 GMT -5
I think in NCAA, it's a one-point safety. I remember seeing it happen in college game a few years ago. It would make it interesting if the NFL adopted a one-point safety for running back a failed PAT attempt. It's 2 points. Only single point, besides the PAT, is in Canada. And in Miami since they cant score. |
|
|
|
Post by cj on Oct 11, 2011 7:05:30 GMT -5
A rule change I would like to see.....defensive holding, illegal contact fouls should not be automatic first downs. Itr's third and 27 and there is one of these ticky tack fouls....it negates the whole defensive series. Too many of these penalties are very ticky tack and very subjective as far as I am concerned.....I'm not so sure a 15 yard penalty should be an automatic first down either if it doesn't make the sticks but I can live with that.
|
|
|
|
Post by JugglingReferee on Oct 11, 2011 9:34:36 GMT -5
A rule change I would like to see.....defensive holding, illegal contact fouls should not be automatic first downs. Itr's third and 27 and there is one of these ticky tack fouls....it negates the whole defensive series. Too many of these penalties are very ticky tack and very subjective as far as I am concerned.....I'm not so sure a 15 yard penalty should be an automatic first down either if it doesn't make the sticks but I can live with that. If you remove the AFD, you have to change DH to 10 yards. |
|
Brent
Division I White Hat
Posts: 164
|
Post by Brent on Oct 11, 2011 16:09:31 GMT -5
Umm...in NFHS, you can't run it back. Once the kick attempt is apparently unsuccessful, the play is over. Thumbs up. I was going to post the same thing. Unless they use the NCAA rules and there is something different from NFHS |
|
|
|
Post by JugglingReferee on Oct 11, 2011 16:10:35 GMT -5
Maybe he was thinking HSFB in TX or MA?
|
|
