|
Post by tj on Apr 18, 2011 16:56:17 GMT -5
cj
Not sure who your sarcasm was directed at - but it was interesting enough (my word) that the NHL came out with a press release explaining the call.
I'd say that's interesting.
|
|
|
Post by cj on Apr 18, 2011 19:36:24 GMT -5
I didn't say anything in a sarcdastic manner....I saw the play, the referees saw the play and I thought the right call was made on the ice by both referees...nothing I said was sarcastic. It was a routine minor penalty for interference, the Chicago player did not have the puck. The Chicago player was not injured and yes that has to play a role in supplementary discipline. I saw nothing in that play calling for supplementary discipline and apparently the NHL agrees. Sorry if you thought I was being sarcastic; it was simply my opinion of the play.
|
|