|
|
Post by FredFan7 on Mar 27, 2012 23:37:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bulldog6878 on Mar 28, 2012 1:10:33 GMT -5
I agree with you Fredfan7.
Bulldog
|
|
|
|
Post by cj on Mar 28, 2012 16:26:38 GMT -5
He (Periera) does say, and with this as you know I agree 1000% that the best replay officials should be moved to the command center in New York and ultimately make the final decision (with the help, of the replay official in the stadium talking to the referee.
The problem with the original replay was often there were communication breakdowns....now with the wireless remotes, the referee can be in constant contact with the IR official and in turn the iR official with NY similar to the NHL system and I don't know anybody who doesn't think the NHL replay system is by far, and there is no close second, the best in sports for efficiency and accuracy.
|
|
|
|
Post by timdaye on Mar 28, 2012 16:28:35 GMT -5
The NHL way seems to be the most effective, efficient and consistent.
There is one thing about the current IR system that seems very odd to me. Lets say there is a challenge on a call that is made by the referee. He now has to go and review his own call. Isn't there some inherant bias or conflict there?
|
|
|
|
Post by cj on Mar 28, 2012 16:55:22 GMT -5
The NHL way seems to be the most effective, efficient and consistent. There is one thing about the current IR system that seems very odd to me. Lets say there is a challenge on a call that is made by the referee. He now has to go and review his own call. Isn't there some inherant bias or conflict there? It doesn't just have to be the referee overruling his own call...what if it's one of those could have gone either way and he overrules the back judge and the back judge is sure he made the right call. Could make a very interesting dinner discussion the next week. |
|
